Failure Modes of Implicit Decisions
Christian Ullrich
January 2026
This document lists recurring execution failures caused by decisions that remain implicit. The items describe downstream outcomes that appear later, often after commitments have been made and reversal becomes costly. The purpose is not to explain why these failures occur, but to make the risk of ambiguity visible at the moment when decisions are still being deferred.
- Contracts are signed with incompatible assumptions across legal, procurement, and operations.
- Scope is declared frozen, but critical choices remain open and resurface during delivery.
- Ownership appears agreed until the first incident, escalation, or external review.
- Stakeholders approve the same wording while expecting different outcomes.
- Legal, financial, or compliance objections surface only after commitments are written.
- Teams proceed in parallel based on conflicting interpretations of what was decided.
- Dependencies are discovered mid-execution that could have been resolved earlier.
- Rework replaces progress as decisions are renegotiated one by one.
- Escalations increase because unresolved decisions resurface as delivery problems.
- Schedules slip without a clear cause because execution pauses for clarification.
- Accountability dissolves when downsides materialize, and no owner can be identified.
- Political conflict intensifies as ambiguity is used to reopen settled questions.
- Trust erodes as people realize alignment never meant agreement.
- Reversals happen informally through reinterpretation rather than explicit choice.
- The organization pays the cost of delay and correction with no visible decision failure to point to.
Homepage - Terms of service • Privacy policy • Legal notice