Most organizations can produce clear-looking plans, slides, and meeting notes. The problem starts when different stakeholders try to act on them. The same text is interpreted differently, assumptions stay implicit, and meetings repeat because no one can point to what was actually decided. This site offers a different way to read project material and assess outputs: by translating it into explicit decision sentences that state the choice being made, the alternative being ruled out, and the downside associated with it.

We are Miriam and Christian Ullrich.
Christian works with complex organizational material in which decisions are present but rarely stated clearly enough to withstand later scrutiny. His focus is on reconstructing what meetings, documents, and plans actually commit an organization to, including the alternatives excluded and the downsides implicitly accepted. He does not produce slides, analysis, training, or recommendations.
Miriam supports the work by reviewing structure and language so the material remains precise, readable, and intelligible beyond the immediate project context.